Home
Abstract
My Abstract(s)
Login
ePosters
Back
Final Presentation Format
Podium Abstract
Eposter Presentation
Eposter in PDF Format
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
Eposter in Image Format
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
Presentation Date / Time
Submission Status
Submitted
Abstract
Abstract Title
Association of Hyaluronic Acid Rectal Spacer Quality Metrics with Rectal Dosimetry and Acute and Late Gastrointestinal (GI) Toxicity Outcomes
Presentation Type
Podium Abstract
Manuscript Type
Clinical Research
Abstract Category *
Oncology: Prostate
Author's Information
Number of Authors (including submitting/presenting author) *
5
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Country
Australia
Co-author 1
Yuan-Hong Lin yuanhonglin612@gmail.com Austin Health Radiation Oncology Melbourne Australia *
Co-author 2
Daryl-Lim Joon Daryl.LimJoon@genesiscare.com Austin Health Radiation Oncology Melbourne Australia
Co-author 3
Damien Bolton drdamienbolton@gmail.com Austin Health Urology Melbourne Australia
Co-author 4
Farshad Foroudi farshad.foroudi@austin.org.au Austin Health Radiation Oncology Melbourne Australia
Co-author 5
Michael Chao Michael.Chao@genesiscare.com Austin Health Radiation Oncology Melbourne Australia
Co-author 6
Co-author 7
Co-author 8
Co-author 9
Co-author 10
Co-author 11
Co-author 12
Co-author 13
Co-author 14
Co-author 15
Co-author 16
Co-author 17
Co-author 18
Co-author 19
Co-author 20
Abstract Content
Introduction
Hyaluronic acid (HA) rectal spacers (RS) are used to increase rectoprostatic separation during external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) to lower rectal dosimetry and acute/late GI toxicity. Quality of the implant is likely to influence dosimetric and toxicity outcomes. Purpose of this study is to assess implant quality using modified SQS (mSQS) and FV scores achieved in men with localised prostate cancer (PCa) treated with moderately hypofractionated EBRT who underwent stabilized HA RS implant, and its impact on acute and late GI toxicity.
Materials and Methods
We reviewed 100 consecutive men with localised PCa treated with moderately hypofractionated EBRT (60Gy/62Gy in 20 fractions) and underwent HA RS insertion, treated between June 2020 - September 2022. Acute and late GI toxicity were assessed using CTCAEv5. Implant quality was assessed using mSQS (recto-prostatic separation (RPS)), FV score (symmetry) and RS rectal wall infiltration (RWI) evaluated on post implant T2-weighted MRI axial slices. RWI was independently assessed by an MRI prostate specialist radiologist. SQS, RWI and FV scoring were performed according to prior publications by Grossman et al and Fischer-Valuck et al. mSQS scores were used to stringently account for our planning target volume (PTV) expansions (mSQS score 2 = ≥10mm RPS, mSQS score 1 = 6-9mm RPS, mSQS score 0 = ≤5mm RPS).
Results
Mean age was 74.6 years (SD 6.0 y); 54 patients had unfavourable intermediate risk PCa, 33 had favourable intermediate risk PCa and 9 had low risk PCa. 88 patients were treated to 60Gy in 20 fractions, while 12 patients were treated to 62Gy in 20 fractions. Of the RS implants, 98% were deemed “very easy” by the injector and 2% were deemed “easy”. Overall mSQS score of 1 (“excellent”) was achieved in 74 patients, score of 2 in 24 patients, and a score of 0 occurred in just 2 patients. 97% of the injectors successfully shaped HA to achieve symmetrical rectal spacing with FV score 1. Seven acute G1 GI toxicity, and 5 late G1 GI toxicity were recorded. There was no ≥G2 acute or late GI toxicity. No statistically significant association was identified between FV and SQS scores with acute or late GI toxicity incidence. Only 1 patient experienced implant RWI and the RWI was reversed with hyaluronidase, with no significant sequelae reported. He was subsequently reimplanted successfully with HA RS and completed EBRT uneventfully. Median follow-up was 1.68 years (IQR: 1.28-2.23), with only one regional recurrence reported.
Conclusions
The majority (97%) of patients who underwent HA RS implant had easily achieved high quality RS (both modified SQS scores 1-2 and FV score 1). This translated to low rectal doses and low incidence of acute and late G1 GI toxicities. Stabilised HA RS may be considered in patients undergoing hypofractionated EBRT to the prostate.
Keywords
Prostate cancer Hyaluronic acid rectal spacer Gastrointestinal toxicity
Figure 1
Figure 1 Caption
Figure 2
Figure 2 Caption
Figure 3
Figure 3 Caption
Figure 4
Figure 4 Caption
Figure 5
Figure 5 Caption
Character Count
2805
Vimeo Link
Presentation Details
Session
Free Paper Podium(07): Oncology Prostate (B)
Date
Aug. 15 (Fri.)
Time
13:48 - 13:54
Presentation Order
4