Home
Abstract
My Abstract(s)
Login
ePosters
Back
Final Presentation Format
Non-Moderated Poster Abstract
Eposter Presentation
Eposter in PDF Format
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
Eposter in Image Format
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
Presentation Date / Time
Submission Status
Submitted
Abstract
Abstract Title
Efficacy of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy and factors affecting treatment outcome in renal and ureteric stone disease: Our experience in single centre study.
Presentation Type
Podium Abstract
Manuscript Type
Clinical Research
Abstract Category *
Endourology: Urolithiasis
Author's Information
Number of Authors (including submitting/presenting author) *
6
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Country
India
Co-author 1
Kawaljit Singh Kaura kskaura@gmail.com All India Institute of Medical Sciences , Bathinda urology Bathinda India -
Co-author 2
Abhay Singh Gaur drabhaysgaur@gmail.com All India Institute of Medical Sciences , Bathinda urology Bathinda India -
Co-author 3
Suresh Goyal Sureshgoyal7@gmail.com All India Institute of Medical Sciences , Bathinda urology Bathinda India -
Co-author 4
Abhishek Chhabra abhi.chhabra796@gmail.com All India Institute of Medical Sciences , Bathinda urology Bathinda India *
Co-author 5
Tejas Chaudhari tejaschau@gmail.com All India Institute of Medical Sciences , Bathinda urology Bathinda India -
Co-author 6
Manish kumar manishkhichar96@gmail.com All India Institute of Medical Sciences , Bathinda urology bathinda India -
Co-author 7
-
Co-author 8
-
Co-author 9
-
Co-author 10
-
Co-author 11
-
Co-author 12
-
Co-author 13
-
Co-author 14
-
Co-author 15
-
Co-author 16
-
Co-author 17
-
Co-author 18
-
Co-author 19
-
Co-author 20
-
Abstract Content
Introduction
We aimed to evaluate efficacy of Extracorporeal Stone Wave Lithotripsy(ESWL) in achieving stone free rates in patients having renal stone and ureteric Stones disease and factors influencing better stone free rates. This study also presents single tertiary care centre large population data about demographics and outcomes after ESWL over period of 4 years
Materials and Methods
The retrospective study included records of 1051 patients with Renal and ureteric Stones, 10 – 25 mm in size, undergoing ESWL sessions as an outpatient procedure. Fragmentation and three-month follow-up stone-free rate (SFR) was assessed through radiographic imaging. Treatment was labelled successful if there were no residual fragments or they were ≤4 mm, three months after the last session.
Results
There were 750 (71.36%) males and 301 (28.64%) females in this study. The mean age ± standard deviation of patients was 43.35 ± 13.86 .The mean ± standard deviation (range) stone size was 14.22 ± 5.06 mm. 92.96%(n=977) patients had single stone 5.70%(n=60) patients had two stones 1.34% (n=14) patients had 3 stones which. The mean ± standard deviation (range) stone Hounsfield Units was 1095 ± 311 HU. Cumulative SFR after the first session was 45.57%(n=479). Cumulative SFR after second session was 77.25(n= 812). 22.75% (n= 239) patients required third session of ESWL of which 113 patient had SFR(10.75%). Cumulative SFR after three sessions of ESWL was 87.25%. In 126 (12.75%) patients the treatment was a failure. Complications occurred in 7.4%, while auxiliary procedures were needed in 6.75 % of cases, both significantly affected by the stone size. Treatment outcome was significantly different depending on stone size, BMI, number of sessions, complications. Univariate regression analysis identified stone size and BMI as significant predictors of treatment outcome.
Conclusions
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy continues to be a safe and effective option for managing simple calculi in renal stone and ureteric stone disease with a diameter of ≤15 mm. The stone size, HU and BMI remain significant predictors of treatment outcome.
Keywords
ESWL, SFR, HU , BMI
Figure 1
Figure 1 Caption
Figure 2
Figure 2 Caption
Figure 3
Figure 3 Caption
Figure 4
Figure 4 Caption
Figure 5
Figure 5 Caption
Character Count
2086
Vimeo Link
Presentation Details
Session
Date
Time
Presentation Order