Home
Abstract
My Abstract(s)
Login
ePosters
Back
Final Presentation Format
Video Abstract
Eposter Presentation
Eposter in PDF Format
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
Eposter in Image Format
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
Presentation Date / Time
Submission Status
Submitted
Abstract
Abstract Title
Safe Robotic Pyeloplasty In Infants and Small Children - A Video Demonstration
Presentation Type
Video Abstract
Manuscript Type
Clinical Research
Abstract Category *
Novel Advances: Robotic Surgery
Author's Information
Number of Authors (including submitting/presenting author) *
2
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Country
India
Co-author 1
Kumaravel Sambandan drskvel@gmail.com JIPMER, INDIA PONDICHERRY India *
Co-author 2
Geetesh Ratre drgeeteshratre@gmail.com JIPMER, INDIA PONDICHERRY India -
Co-author 3
-
Co-author 4
-
Co-author 5
-
Co-author 6
-
Co-author 7
-
Co-author 8
-
Co-author 9
-
Co-author 10
-
Co-author 11
-
Co-author 12
-
Co-author 13
-
Co-author 14
-
Co-author 15
-
Co-author 16
-
Co-author 17
-
Co-author 18
-
Co-author 19
-
Co-author 20
-
Abstract Content
Introduction
Even though there is an exponential increase in the utilization of robotic assistance in surgery for children, many doubts still exist regarding its utility in smaller children, possibly due to 8mm ports, large instruments, and perceived need for larger working space. Hence we reviewed children who underwent Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty(RALP) to evaluate its safety and outcomes in small children.
Materials and Methods
Children under 15 kilograms who underwent RALP were reviewed with respect to, docking times, operative duration, complications, conversions, duration of catheter and dj stent and hospital stay. Success of the procedure was evaluated with USG and diuretic renogram over a minimum follow up of six months.
Results
Of the 132 children who underwent RALP over the past 3.5 years, Forty Eight were in children under 15kgs. The Median age/weight was 12 months(IQR 5.5-30m)/ 8.4kg. 87.5% were antenatally diagnosed. The duration of RALP was a median of 126 minutes(IQR 99-153). The average blood loss was 7ml. None needed conversion. The duration of catheter were 1.7 days and drain duration of 2 days(where used), median hospital stay of 2.8 days and dj stent of 6 weeks. My current practice is not to use any drains. Early complications included three patients with a prolonged urinary leak, treated conservatively. Five patients had UTI requiring antibiotics. On a follow-up of more than six months, Median Transverse Pelvic Diameter(TPD) reduced from 3.42 cms to 1.8cms. On diuretic renograpy, drainage improved in 47 of 48 patients with no drop in function. Only one had recurrence requiring redo.
Conclusions
RALP, with minimal modifications and attention to detail, can also be performed in small children safely with good outcomes. We describe modifications to make this procedure safe with good outcomes.
Keywords
robotic infant pyeloplasty, pediatric pyeloplasty, robotic surgery
Figure 1
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/a7345af079e9069f7d242e1d470cd62a.jpg
Figure 1 Caption
left infant robotic pyeloplasty, Port positions
Figure 2
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/5c94a46033e5eb7d6dcff8e51fc55f7a.png
Figure 2 Caption
Completed left robotic Pyeloplasty in an infant
Figure 3
Figure 3 Caption
Figure 4
Figure 4 Caption
Figure 5
Figure 5 Caption
Character Count
2797
Vimeo Link
https://vimeo.com/1075656779
Presentation Details
Session
Free Paper Video(04): Oncology Kidney
Date
Aug. 16 (Sat.)
Time
16:47 - 16:54
Presentation Order
12