Home
Abstract
My Abstract(s)
Login
ePosters
Back
Final Presentation Format
Non-Moderated Poster Abstract
Eposter Presentation
Eposter in PDF Format
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/57aa845b0fbf0381a50789dcd52822bc.pdf
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
Eposter in Image Format
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/751b02e973867498e360c950a0903ebb.jpg
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
Presentation Date / Time
Submission Status
Submitted
Abstract
Abstract Title
Natural history of symptomatic ureteric stone with emergency admission – A single center retrospective study
Presentation Type
Podium Abstract
Manuscript Type
Clinical Research
Abstract Category *
Endourology: Urolithiasis
Author's Information
Number of Authors (including submitting/presenting author) *
10
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Country
Hong Kong, China
Co-author 1
Ivan ching ho KO chinghoko@gmail.com SH Ho Urology Centre, Prince of Wales Hosptial, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, HKSAR Hong Kong Hong Kong, China -
Co-author 2
Chris Ho Ming Wong chriswong@surgery.cuhk.edu.hk SH Ho Urology Centre, Prince of Wales Hosptial, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, HKSAR Hong Kong Hong Kong, China *
Co-author 3
Brian Chun Fai Kwok briankwok@surgery.cuhk.edu.hk SH Ho Urology Centre, Prince of Wales Hosptial, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, HKSAR Hong Kong Hong Kong, China -
Co-author 4
Yung Yung Joycelyn Lim joycelynlim@surgery.cuhk.edu.hk SH Ho Urology Centre, Prince of Wales Hosptial, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, HKSAR Hong Kong Hong Kong, China -
Co-author 5
Amy Nga Kwan Chan amychan031105@gmail.com SH Ho Urology Centre, Prince of Wales Hosptial, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, HKSAR Hong Kong Hong Kong, China -
Co-author 6
David Ka Wai Leung davidleung@surgery.cuhk.edu.hk SH Ho Urology Centre, Prince of Wales Hosptial, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, HKSAR Hong Kong Hong Kong, China -
Co-author 7
Francis Chun Him Wong franciswong@surgery.cuhk.edu.hk Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, North District Hospital, Hong Kong Hong Kong Hong Kong, China -
Co-author 8
Steffi Kar Kei Yuen steffiyuen@surgery.cuhk.edu.hk Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, North District Hospital, Hong Kong Hong Kong Hong Kong, China -
Co-author 9
Wilson Hoi Chak Chan wilchan82@yahoo.com.hk Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, North District Hospital, Hong Kong Hong Kong Hong Kong, China -
Co-author 10
Chi Fai Ng ngcf@surgery.cuhk.edu.hk Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, North District Hospital, Hong Kong Hong Kong Hong Kong, China - SH Ho Urology Centre, Prince of Wales Hosptial, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, HKSAR Hong Kong Hong Kong, China
Co-author 11
Co-author 12
Co-author 13
Co-author 14
Co-author 15
Co-author 16
Co-author 17
Co-author 18
Co-author 19
Co-author 20
Abstract Content
Introduction
Ureteral stones frequently cause acute urological emergencies with potential complications such as infection or renal dysfunction. This study evaluates the clinical outcomes of patients admitted with symptomatic ureteral stones, focusing on spontaneous passage rates, complications, and treatment strategies. Our findings aim to guide clinical decision-making by identifying which patients benefit most from observation versus early intervention.
Materials and Methods
We reviewed the medical records of patients with symptomatic ureteric stones admitted to our institution between January 2022 and December 2023. Stone characteristics were evaluated using non-contrast computed tomography(NCCT). We analyzed clinical and laboratory variables alongside treatment outcomes. The spontaneous passage of the stone is defined as either the patient's observation of the stone in their urine or the absence of the primary stone on follow-up imaging. Continuous variables are presented as median(interquartile range), while categorical variables are presented as count(percentage).
Results
A total of 382 patients were admitted to our institution during the study period. Among the patients, 349 (91.4%) presented with solitary ureteric stones. The median duration of hospitalization was 2 days(IQR 2-3). The median stone size, measured by the longest dimension in mm, was 5(IQR 4-8). Hydronephrosis and emphysematous pyelonephritis were identified in 254(66.5%) and 13(3.4%) of NCCT cases, respectively. A total of 182 patients(47.7%) suffered from complicated urinary tract infections, with 5 patients(2.7%) being admitted to the intensive care unit. For sepsis, emergency drainage of the obstructed urinary system was performed in 19 patients (10.4%) through ureteric stent placement and in 25 patients (13.7%) via percutaneous nephrostomy. A total of 144(37.7%) of patients suffered from acute kidney injury. They were managed with the insertion of a ureteric stent (15, 10.4%), percutaneous nephrostomy (16, 11.1%), emergency ureteroscopic lithotripsy (2, 1.4%) and conservative management (111, 77.1%). Regarding definitive stone treatment, 46 patients(12.1%) underwent extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, 83(21.8%) received ureteroscopic lithotripsy, 10(2.6%) were treated with endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery, and 241(63.4%) were managed conservatively. Among the conservatively managed patients, 32(13.1%) did not return for follow-up, while 153(72.5%) passed their ureteric stones by the follow-up date. Large stone size (CI95% 0.83, 0.73 – 0.94, p = 0.003) and proximal ureteric stone (CI 95% 0.31m 0.14 – 0.69, p = 0.004) were the identified as negative predictive factors for spontaneous stone passage.
Conclusions
Most symptomatic ureteric stones could be managed conservatively with a high spontaneous passage rate. These findings support individualized treatment strategies, emphasizing the importance of timely drainage for severe cases while recognizing the effectiveness of observation for uncomplicated stones
Keywords
Urolithiasis Ureteric stone
Figure 1
Figure 1 Caption
Figure 2
Figure 2 Caption
Figure 3
Figure 3 Caption
Figure 4
Figure 4 Caption
Figure 5
Figure 5 Caption
Character Count
2687
Vimeo Link
Presentation Details
Session
Date
Time
Presentation Order
0