Home
Abstract
My Abstract(s)
Login
ePosters
Back
Final Presentation Format
Non-Moderated Poster Abstract
Eposter Presentation
Eposter in PDF Format
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/120640f84a7f3204ca34bb2f5b131400.pdf
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
Eposter in Image Format
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/fbc9c799690fe12d53a641786f702283.jpg
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
Presentation Date / Time
Submission Status
Submitted
Abstract
Abstract Title
The Dartos Difference: A Retrospective Analysis of 101 Preserving Circumcisions
Presentation Type
Podium Abstract
Manuscript Type
Basic Research
Abstract Category *
Andrology: Sexual and Erectile Dysfunction
Author's Information
Number of Authors (including submitting/presenting author) *
7
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Country
India
Co-author 1
Sriraj Chodisetti srirajchodisetti@gmail.com MS Ramaiah Medical College Urology Bengaluru India *
Co-author 2
Prasad Mylarappa prasadmyluro2@gmail.com MS Ramaiah Medical College Urology Bengaluru India -
Co-author 3
Manasa T manasat7@gmail.com MS Ramaiah Medical College Urology Bengaluru India -
Co-author 4
Tarun Javali tarundilip.j@ramaiahgroup.org MS Ramaiah Medical College Urology Bengaluru India -
Co-author 5
Ramesh Desigowda arunacr1@gmail.com MS Ramaiah Medical College Urology Bengaluru India -
Co-author 6
Sandeep Puvvada dr.sandeep001@gmail.com MS Ramaiah Medical College Urology Bengaluru India -
Co-author 7
Abhishek Kulkarni drabhishekkulkarni1606@gmail.com MS Ramaiah Medical College Urology Bengaluru India -
Co-author 8
Co-author 9
Co-author 10
Co-author 11
Co-author 12
Co-author 13
Co-author 14
Co-author 15
Co-author 16
Co-author 17
Co-author 18
Co-author 19
Co-author 20
Abstract Content
Introduction
Dartos preserving circumcision aims to minimize complications and preserve penile sensitivity. This study evaluates the outcomes of this technique in a cohort of 101 patients, drawing comparisons with existing literature on circumcision outcomes.
Materials and Methods
A retrospective review was conducted on 101 patients who underwent Dartos preserving circumcision between 2019 and 2023 at MS Ramaiah Medical College, Bangalore. Demographic and clinical data were collected and analysed. The Intraoperative and postoperative parameters were assessed for outcomes including operative time, reactionary hemorrhage, penile edema, wound infection, glanular scab formation, wound scarring, chronic pain, meatal stenosis, chordee and altered sensitivity and patient satisfaction were assessed.
Results
The mean operative time was found to be 21+/-1 minutes. Postoperative complications observed were reactionary hemorrhage (2 cases, 1.98%), penile edema (3 cases, 2.97%), glanular scab formation (2 cases, 1.98%), wound scarring (2 cases, 1.98%), wound infection (3 cases, 2.97%), chronic pain (1 case, 0.99%) and reduced postoperative sensitivity (2 cases, 1.98%). Patient satisfaction was high, with 90 patients (89.11%) reporting being very satisfied, 9 patients (8.91%) satisfied, and 2 patients (1.98%) reporting neutral satisfaction. No patients had developed chordee and meatal stenosis. The above findings of post-operative complications were found to be well below the expected range as per current existing literature
Conclusions
Dartos preserving circumcision demonstrates a favorable safety profile with minimal complications and high patient satisfaction. The observed complication rates are comparable to those reported in larger adult circumcision studies, while the preservation of Dartos layer appears to contribute to minimal sensory alteration. This technique offers a viable surgical option, balancing efficacy and patient-reported outcomes.
Keywords
Circumcision, Dartos preservation, postoperative complications, patient satisfaction, penile surgery
Figure 1
Figure 1 Caption
Figure 2
Figure 2 Caption
Figure 3
Figure 3 Caption
Figure 4
Figure 4 Caption
Figure 5
Figure 5 Caption
Character Count
1493
Vimeo Link
Presentation Details
Session
Date
Time
Presentation Order
0