Home
Abstract
My Abstract(s)
Login
ePosters
Back
Final Presentation Format
Moderated Poster Abstract
Eposter Presentation
Eposter in PDF Format
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
Eposter in Image Format
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
Presentation Date / Time
Submission Status
Submitted
Abstract
Abstract Title
Predictive Accuracy of Stone Size, Volume, and Density, on Surgical Outcomes in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Solitary Renal Stones Less < 2 Cm: a Retrospective Analysis
Presentation Type
Moderated Poster Abstract
Manuscript Type
Basic Research
Abstract Category *
Endourology: Urolithiasis
Author's Information
Number of Authors (including submitting/presenting author) *
3
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Country
Philippines
Co-author 1
Tomas Mario Yanga tomasyanga@gmail.com Jose R. Reyes Memorial Medical Center Urology Manila Philippines *
Co-author 2
Albert Aquino tomasyanga@gmail.com Jose R. Reyes Memorial Medical Center Urology Manila Philippines -
Co-author 3
Hansel Lastrilla tomasyanga@gmail.com Jose R. Reyes Memorial Medical Center Urology Manila Philippines -
Co-author 4
-
Co-author 5
-
Co-author 6
-
Co-author 7
-
Co-author 8
-
Co-author 9
-
Co-author 10
-
Co-author 11
-
Co-author 12
-
Co-author 13
-
Co-author 14
-
Co-author 15
-
Co-author 16
-
Co-author 17
-
Co-author 18
-
Co-author 19
-
Co-author 20
-
Abstract Content
Introduction
Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) is a highly effective, minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of renal stones, particularly for those less than 2 cm in size. Current clinical practice relies primarily on two-dimensional measurements of stone size to predict surgical outcomes. However, the role of three-dimensional stone volume as a more accurate predictor of key outcomes, such as stone-free rates (SFR) and complications, remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the predictive capabilities of stone size, volume, and density on postoperative outcomes, specifically 1.) SFR, 2.) complication rate using the Clavien-Dindo Grading System, and 3.) length of hospital stay, in patients who underwent RIRS for solitary renal stones <2cm.
Materials and Methods
A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 54 patients who underwent RIRS between August 2022 and August 2024 in a tertiary hospital in the Philippines. Data on patient demographics, stone characteristics (size, volume, density), and operative details were collected. Stone size was measured in centimeters, stone density in Hounsfield units, while stone volume was calculated using the ellipsoid formula. SFR one month after surgery was the primary outcome, while the complication rate (Clavien-Dindo classification) and length of hospital stay were the secondary outcomes. Predictive performance was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
Results
The stone-free rate of all participants was 94.44%, with 5.56% of patients having residual stones. Stone size showed poor predictive capability for residual stones (AUC: 0.6569) and complications (AUC: 0.6726), however, it demonstrated fair accuracy for predicting prolonged hospital stay (AUC: 0.7624). Stone volume exhibited slightly better but still poor predictability for residual stones (AUC: 0.6993), complications (AUC: 0.5747), and hospital stay (AUC: 0.6547). Stone density performed the worst for predicting residual stones (AUC: 0.5163) but showed moderate accuracy for predicting complications (AUC: 0.7364).
Conclusions
Both stone size and volume demonstrated limited predictive capabilities for residual stones and complications following RIRS, while stone density was moderately useful for predicting complications. These findings suggest that stone characteristics alone may not be sufficient for preoperative decision-making. Future research should focus on developing comprehensive predictive models that incorporate multiple clinical factors to improve surgical outcomes.
Keywords
RIRS, Endourology, Urolithiasis
Figure 1
Figure 1 Caption
Figure 2
Figure 2 Caption
Figure 3
Figure 3 Caption
Figure 4
Figure 4 Caption
Figure 5
Figure 5 Caption
Character Count
2511
Vimeo Link
Presentation Details
Session
Free Paper Moderated Poster(09): Novel Advances & Endourology
Date
Aug. 16 (Sat.)
Time
16:56 - 17:00
Presentation Order
20