Home
Abstract
My Abstract(s)
Login
ePosters
Back
Final Presentation Format
Moderated Poster Abstract
Eposter Presentation
Eposter in PDF Format
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/cd4820930b7ec44509f16fffa9826290.pdf
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
Eposter in Image Format
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/8d1142d7ee7ab0a7f44038d409fd5908.png
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
Presentation Date / Time
Submission Status
Submitted
Abstract
Abstract Title
Perioperative outcome of minimally invasive versus open partial nephrectomy of localized renal cell carcinoma - A single centre retrospective 5-year study
Presentation Type
Moderated Poster Abstract
Manuscript Type
Clinical Research
Abstract Category *
Oncology: Kidney (non-UTUC)
Author's Information
Number of Authors (including submitting/presenting author) *
9
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Country
Hong Kong, China
Co-author 1
Tsz Paak CHANG eunice.chang1804@gmail.com Queen Mary Hospital Surgery Hong Kong Hong Kong, China *
Co-author 2
Stacia Chun stac@hku.hk Queen Mary Hospital Surgery Hong Kong Hong Kong, China -
Co-author 3
Hoi Lung Wong simonwonghoilung@hotmail.com Queen Mary Hospital Surgery Hong Kong Hong Kong, China -
Co-author 4
Wilson Pui Long HUNG wilsonplhung@yahoo.com.hk Queen Mary Hospital Surgery Hong Kong Hong Kong, China -
Co-author 5
Ting Fung Wong thomaswong1023@gmail.com Queen Mary Hospital Surgery Hong Kong Hong Kong, China -
Co-author 6
Chiu Fung Tsang tcf672@ha.org.hk Queen Mary Hospital Surgery Hong Kong Hong Kong, China -
Co-author 7
Terence Chun-Ting Lai lct729@ha.org.hk Queen Mary Hospital Surgery Hong Kong Hong Kong, China -
Co-author 8
Na Yung yungna@hku.hk Queen Mary Hospital Surgery Hong Kong Hong Kong, China -
Co-author 9
Ada Tsui-Lin Ng ntl188@ha.org.hk Queen Mary Hospital Surgery Hong Kong Hong Kong, China -
Co-author 10
Co-author 11
Co-author 12
Co-author 13
Co-author 14
Co-author 15
Co-author 16
Co-author 17
Co-author 18
Co-author 19
Co-author 20
Abstract Content
Introduction
As the oncological outcome of partial nephrectomy (PN) is comparable with radical nephrectomy (RN) and has better renal function preservation, PN is now the standard treatment for T1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and should be considered in T1b whenever feasible according to the European Association of Urology (EAU) guideline. However, limited local data regarding the outcomes of PN are available. This study aims at reporting the perioperative outcomes of PN, minimally invasive versus open, of localized RCC from a Hong Kong institute.
Materials and Methods
Patients with T1 RCC who underwent partial nephrectomy between January 2019 and December 2023 in Queen Mary Hospital were reviewed. Perioperative outcomes were analyzed using t-test and ANOVA (Analysis of variance).
Results
121 patients (median age 66 years old) were enrolled. 70 patients (57.9%) underwent minimally invasive surgery (Group 1) (56.2% being robotic-assisted surgery and 2.5% being laparoscopic surgery) while 50 (41.3%) had adopted an open surgical approach (Group 2). The average tumour size was 2.36 ± 0.92 cm in group 1 and 3.23 ± 1.19 cm in group 2 (p=<0.001). The minimally invasive partial nephrectomy has a shorter mean operative time (162.92 ± 45.9 minutes vs 187.5 ±43.6 minutes, p=0.004). Also, there is less blood loss (270 ± 248 ml vs 444.64 ± 326.1 ml, p= 0.05) and a shorter postoperative length of stay (3.8 days vs 5 days, p=<0.001) were found in Group 1. The mean ischemic time was 19.1 ± 7.77minutes in group 1 vs 16.6 ±6.56 minutes in group 2, p= 0.13. In general, the complications of PN were low with 13% being Claviden-Dindo Grade I or II (e.g. fever and urinary tract infection) and 0.8% had pseudoaneurysm requiring embolization. Renal function was assessed pre-operatively, upon discharge, at postoperative first and third year. It is noted that for patients with stage 2 chronic kidney disease (CKD) preoperatively, there is around two third of patient remains in stage 2 (CKD) and there is around one third of them have developed to stage 3 CKD upon discharge , at 1-year and 3-year follow-up interval.
Conclusions
Partial nephrectomy for T1 renal cell carcinoma has favorable perioperative outcomes. Minimally invasive approach has less blood loss, shorter length of postoperative stay and preservation of renal function is achieved in the majority of the PN cases with a good safety profile.
Keywords
Partial nephrectomy, T1 renal cell carcinoma, minimally invasive vs open surgery
Figure 1
Figure 1 Caption
Figure 2
Figure 2 Caption
Figure 3
Figure 3 Caption
Figure 4
Figure 4 Caption
Figure 5
Figure 5 Caption
Character Count
2076
Vimeo Link
Presentation Details
Session
Free Paper Moderated Poster(05): Oncology RCC & Miscellaneous
Date
Aug. 15 (Fri.)
Time
16:20 - 16:24
Presentation Order
11