Moderated Poster Abstract
Eposter Presentation
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/119aeee1835427add3d0774d8b20255c.pdf
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/62065cbb0a52a06fd0143443b07e2298.jpg
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
 
Submitted
Abstract
Bladder Filling (BF) versus Standard Catheter Removal (SR) for Trial Without Catheter (TWOC): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Moderated Poster Abstract
Meta Analysis / Systematic Review
Nursing
Author's Information
2
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Philippines
Maria Immanuelle Devela yel.devela@gmail.com UERM Memorial Hospital Section of Urology, Department of Surgery Quezon City Philippines *
Angelo Russell Chua adchua@uerm.edu.ph UERM Memorial Hospital As of April 13, 2025: 152 of 256 cases done: 59% of index cases accomplished Quezon City Philippines -
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Abstract Content
Removal of Foley catheter and subsequent monitoring for spontaneous void is known as “trial without catheter.” The is currently no standard technique in doing so and the current practice is by removing the catheter and waiting for physiologic filling of bladder. Bladder infusion, involving filling up a pre-defined volume of saline into the bladder or until the patient has urge, is a technique that may reduce the time until patient is able to void and be discharged. To systematically review the evidence examining the efficacy of two modes of trial without catheter: bladder filling vs standard removal of catheter in patients who underwent surgical procedures. The primary outcome measure will be the success of TWOC. The secondary outcomes will be time-to-decision and time-to discharge.
An online database search for randomized controlled trials on bladder filling versus standard removal for trial without catheter was done. Review Manager version 5.4 was used for data analysis. Odds ratio was used for the dichotomous data and mean difference was used for continuous data. Heterogeneity was assessed with Chi Square Test and Inconsistency Index (if with substantial heterogeneity if I2 = >50%), while a random effects model was used if significant heterogeneity was present. Risk of Bias 2 tool was used to assess bias for the individual studies included. Sensitivity analysis was done on outcomes with high risk of bias and heterogeneity.
Eleven studies were included, with a total of 957 participants. TWOC is more likely to be successful in bladder filling group compared to standard removal of catheter group (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.43-2.98, p = 0.001), without significant heterogeneity (I2 = 6%). Time-to-decision was shorter group (WMD -124.71, 95% CI -198.39 - -51.03, p = 0.0009) in the BF group than in the SR group. Time-to-discharge was noted to be significantly shorter (WMD -72.00, 95% CI -112.21 - -31.79, p = 0.0002) in BF group than SR group.
Bladder filling is a safe, simple, and efficient way to perform TWOC. It establishes bladder emptying that satisfies assessment of patient’s ability to void spontaneously.
Trial without catheter, bladder filling, catheter removal
 
Meta-analysis showing successful trial without catheter (TWOC) comparing bladder filling versus standard catheter removal technique according to Forest plot
 
Meta-analysis showing time-to-void / time-to-decision comparing bladder filling versus standard catheter removal technique according to Forest plot
 
Meta-analysis showing time-to-discharge comparing bladder filling versus standard catheter removal technique according to Forest plot
 
 
 
 
1961
 
Presentation Details
Free Paper Podium & Moderated Poster: Nursing
Aug. 16 (Sat.)
16:00 - 16:04
4