Home
Abstract
My Abstract(s)
Login
ePosters
Back
Final Presentation Format
Non-Moderated Poster Abstract
Eposter Presentation
Eposter in PDF Format
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/80644526c1eabac83001e6372ee6d5e0.pdf
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
Eposter in Image Format
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/8fe1fe594e863ef7c7519a2af6a72946.jpg
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
Presentation Date / Time
Submission Status
Submitted
Abstract
Abstract Title
Prognostic impact of radiological progression at diagnosis of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
Presentation Type
Non-Moderated Poster Abstract
Manuscript Type
Clinical Research
Abstract Category *
Oncology: Prostate
Author's Information
Number of Authors (including submitting/presenting author) *
3
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Country
Japan
Co-author 1
Hiroaki Iwamoto hiroaki017@yahoo.co.jp Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology Kanazawa Japan *
Co-author 2
Kouji Izumi azuizu2003@yahoo.co.jp Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology Kanazawa Japan -
Co-author 3
Atsushi Mizokami mizokami@staff.kanazawa-u.ac.jp Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology Kanazawa Japan -
Co-author 4
Co-author 5
Co-author 6
Co-author 7
Co-author 8
Co-author 9
Co-author 10
Co-author 11
Co-author 12
Co-author 13
Co-author 14
Co-author 15
Co-author 16
Co-author 17
Co-author 18
Co-author 19
Co-author 20
Abstract Content
Introduction
Most cases of metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) eventually progress to metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), which is defined as progression despite castrate levels of serum testosterone. In clinical practice, progression is often assessed based on PSA kinetics. However, data on the prognostic impact of radiographic progressive disease (rPD) at mCRPC diagnosis remain limited.
Materials and Methods
Of 219 mCSPC patients treated at our institution from 2000 to 2020, 108 with available imaging data at CRPC progression were included. A retrospective chart review was conducted to assess the clinical significance of rPD.
Results
The median age of the patients was 70 years, and the median PSA level was 234.5 ng/mL. A Gleason score ≥9 was observed in 69 patients (63.9%), N1 disease in 72 patients (66.7%), and M1c disease in 12 patients (11.1%). The rPD (-) and rPD (+) groups consisted of 57 and 51 patients, respectively. No significant differences in treatments after CRPC were observed between the groups. Multivariate analysis identified rPD and an alkaline phosphatase (ALP, IFCC) level ≥120 IU/L as significant independent predictors of both overall survival (OS) and prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS) after CRPC.
Conclusions
Patients with rPD (+) and ALP ≥120 IU/L at mCRPC diagnosis had significantly poorer prognosis. These findings highlight the importance of regular imaging follow-up, alongside PSA and blood test monitoring, during mCSPC treatment.
Keywords
metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, radiographic progressive disease, alkaline phosphatase
Figure 1
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/c81be4bd225b1580f8b33e2379db9a13.jpg
Figure 1 Caption
PC = prostate cancer; PSA = prostate-specific antigen; LDH = lactate dehydrogenase; ALP = alkaline phosphatase; BSI = bone scan index; GS = Gleason score
Figure 2
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/fcc4491968ddaf8416d153dc15bbf93a.jpg
Figure 2 Caption
mCRPC = metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer; rPD = radiographic progressive disease
Figure 3
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/e4c436b0cfe5e483f9ac4808ccad10eb.jpg
Figure 3 Caption
(A) Kaplan–Meier curves of OS after CRPC. (B) Kaplan–Meier curves of OS after CRPC according to rPD status. (C) Kaplan–Meier curves of PCSS after CRPC according to ALP Levels.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Caption
Figure 5
Figure 5 Caption
Character Count
1239
Vimeo Link
Presentation Details
Session
Date
Time
Presentation Order
0