Non-Moderated Poster Abstract
Eposter Presentation
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/80644526c1eabac83001e6372ee6d5e0.pdf
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/8fe1fe594e863ef7c7519a2af6a72946.jpg
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
 
Submitted
Abstract
Prognostic impact of radiological progression at diagnosis of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
Non-Moderated Poster Abstract
Clinical Research
Oncology: Prostate
Author's Information
3
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Japan
Hiroaki Iwamoto hiroaki017@yahoo.co.jp Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology Kanazawa Japan *
Kouji Izumi azuizu2003@yahoo.co.jp Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology Kanazawa Japan -
Atsushi Mizokami mizokami@staff.kanazawa-u.ac.jp Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology Kanazawa Japan -
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Abstract Content
Most cases of metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) eventually progress to metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), which is defined as progression despite castrate levels of serum testosterone. In clinical practice, progression is often assessed based on PSA kinetics. However, data on the prognostic impact of radiographic progressive disease (rPD) at mCRPC diagnosis remain limited.
Of 219 mCSPC patients treated at our institution from 2000 to 2020, 108 with available imaging data at CRPC progression were included. A retrospective chart review was conducted to assess the clinical significance of rPD.
The median age of the patients was 70 years, and the median PSA level was 234.5 ng/mL. A Gleason score ≥9 was observed in 69 patients (63.9%), N1 disease in 72 patients (66.7%), and M1c disease in 12 patients (11.1%). The rPD (-) and rPD (+) groups consisted of 57 and 51 patients, respectively. No significant differences in treatments after CRPC were observed between the groups. Multivariate analysis identified rPD and an alkaline phosphatase (ALP, IFCC) level ≥120 IU/L as significant independent predictors of both overall survival (OS) and prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS) after CRPC.
Patients with rPD (+) and ALP ≥120 IU/L at mCRPC diagnosis had significantly poorer prognosis. These findings highlight the importance of regular imaging follow-up, alongside PSA and blood test monitoring, during mCSPC treatment.
metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, radiographic progressive disease, alkaline phosphatase
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/c81be4bd225b1580f8b33e2379db9a13.jpg
PC = prostate cancer; PSA = prostate-specific antigen; LDH = lactate dehydrogenase; ALP = alkaline phosphatase; BSI = bone scan index; GS = Gleason score
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/fcc4491968ddaf8416d153dc15bbf93a.jpg
mCRPC = metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer; rPD = radiographic progressive disease
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/e4c436b0cfe5e483f9ac4808ccad10eb.jpg
(A) Kaplan–Meier curves of OS after CRPC. (B) Kaplan–Meier curves of OS after CRPC according to rPD status. (C) Kaplan–Meier curves of PCSS after CRPC according to ALP Levels.
 
 
 
 
1239
 
Presentation Details
 
 
 
0