Home
Abstract
My Abstract(s)
Login
ePosters
Back
Final Presentation Format
Podium Abstract
Eposter Presentation
Eposter in PDF Format
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
Eposter in Image Format
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
Presentation Date / Time
Submission Status
Submitted
Abstract
Abstract Title
PREDICTIVE FACTORS OF PATHOLOGICAL UPGRADING IN INDIAN PATIENTS WITH GLEASON SCORE 3+4 PROSTATE CANCER: WHEN TO OFFER ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE?
Presentation Type
Podium Abstract
Manuscript Type
Clinical Research
Abstract Category *
Oncology: Prostate
Author's Information
Number of Authors (including submitting/presenting author) *
2
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Country
India
Co-author 1
Shashank Agrawal shank789agrawal@gmail.com Sindhu Institute of Oncology Uro-oncology Hyderabad India *
Co-author 2
Ginil Pooleri drginil@gmail.com Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences Uro-oncology Kochi India -
Co-author 3
-
Co-author 4
-
Co-author 5
-
Co-author 6
-
Co-author 7
-
Co-author 8
-
Co-author 9
-
Co-author 10
-
Co-author 11
-
Co-author 12
-
Co-author 13
-
Co-author 14
-
Co-author 15
-
Co-author 16
-
Co-author 17
-
Co-author 18
-
Co-author 19
-
Co-author 20
-
Abstract Content
Introduction
Offering active surveillance to patients with a Gleason score of 3+4 is a highly controversial topic. This study aims to investigate the incidence of pathological upgrading from biopsy with ISUP Grade Group 2 to prostatectomy and to identify the predictive factors associated with pathological upgrading in this Indian cohort.
Materials and Methods
Retrospective analysis was conducted on 153 patients at a single institution who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy(RARP) between January 2019 and May 2024, following the detection of ISUP Grade Group 2 prostate cancer on biopsy. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the independent factors associated with GG 2 upgrading post-prostatectomy.
Results
82 patients (53.59%) with GG2 had upgrading post-prostatectomy. Patient in upgradation group had higher PSA (median 14.6 vs. 11.2 ng/ml; p=0.006), higher PSA density (median 0.38 vs. 0.29 ng/ml2; p=0.03), higher Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System version 2 (p=0.03) on multiparametric MRI, greater percentage of Gleason 4 pattern on biopsy (median 37.5 vs. 30;p<0.001) and higher maximum standard uptake value (SUV max) (median 10.55 vs. 7.6;p=0.001) on Gallium-68-PSMA positron emission tomography/computer tomography (Ga-68-PSMA PET/ CT). On multivariate analysis, PSA (odds ratio(OR):1.09 (95% CI: 1.03-1.16); p=0.001), the percentage of Gleason 4 (OR: 1.03 (95% CI: 1.01 -1.05); p=0.001) and SUV max (OR: 1.11 (95% CI:1.04 -1.19); p=0.001) were significant predictors of ISUP GG2 upgrading.
Conclusions
A significant proportion of patients with ISUP GG2 prostate cancer on biopsy were upgraded after RARP. PSA, percentage of Gleason 4 pattern on biopsy and SUV max on PSMA PET/CT should be considered before offering active surveillance to these patients.
Keywords
Prostate cancer, ISUP grade group 2
Figure 1
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/8b920deb34b4b051c2a22045a7ae67f7.jpg
Figure 1 Caption
Figure 2
Figure 2 Caption
Figure 3
Figure 3 Caption
Figure 4
Figure 4 Caption
Figure 5
Figure 5 Caption
Character Count
1780
Vimeo Link
Presentation Details
Session
Free Paper Podium(22): Oncology Prostate (F)
Date
Aug. 17 (Sun.)
Time
11:18 - 11:24
Presentation Order
9