Home
Abstract
My Abstract(s)
Login
ePosters
Back
Final Presentation Format
Podium Abstract
Eposter Presentation
Eposter in PDF Format
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
Eposter in Image Format
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
Presentation Date / Time
Submission Status
Submitted
Abstract
Abstract Title
Hyperthermia Intravesical Chemotherapy vs. Bacillus Calmette-Guérin instillation and Mitomycin C Perfusion for Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: A Network Meta-analysis
Presentation Type
Podium Abstract
Manuscript Type
Meta Analysis / Systematic Review
Abstract Category *
Novel Advances: Other Urology Translational Studies
Author's Information
Number of Authors (including submitting/presenting author) *
2
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Country
China
Co-author 1
Xi Gong xi_gong1029@163.com Wuhan China *
Co-author 2
Na Zeng Zeng_hei@163.com Wuhan China -
Co-author 3
-
Co-author 4
-
Co-author 5
-
Co-author 6
-
Co-author 7
-
Co-author 8
-
Co-author 9
-
Co-author 10
-
Co-author 11
-
Co-author 12
-
Co-author 13
-
Co-author 14
-
Co-author 15
-
Co-author 16
-
Co-author 17
-
Co-author 18
-
Co-author 19
-
Co-author 20
-
Abstract Content
Introduction
With the shortage of bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine, it is urgent to find an alternative to BCG instillation, which is the most commonly used adjuvant treatment for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients after transurethral resection of bladder tumor treatment (TURBt) to delay tumor recurrence. Hyperthermia intra-vesical chemotherapy (HIVEC) with mitomycin C (MMC) is a good choice for NMIBC patients as an adjuvant treatment after TURBt. We aim to compare HIVEC with BCG instillation in the preventive efficacy of bladder tumor recurrence and progression by a network meta-analysis (NMA) taking MMC instillation and TURBt as the attached comparators.
Materials and Methods
PubMed (Medline), Ovid (Embase) and Cochrane Library were searched, and the network meta-analysis process followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Articles with BCG unresponsible patients and combined therapies were excluded. Evaluation was based on the recurrence free survival (RFS) and progression free survival (PFS).
Results
72 clinical trials were eligible. A Bayesian consistency network model was generated under a random-effects model. HIVEC played a nonsignificant 22% relative reduction in bladder tumor recurrence compared with BCG instillation (HIVEC vs. BCG: HR 0.78, 95% credible interval [CrI] 0.55–1.08), and a nonsignificant higher risk of bladder tumor progression (BCG vs. HIVEC: HR 0.77, 95% credible interval [CrI] 0.22–3.03). Notably, in subgroup analysis of RFS, HIVEC plays significant 30% relative reduction compared with BCG perfusion (HR 0.70, 95% credible interval [CrI] 0.48–0.99) for patient groups with a higher portion of male. For articles with longer follow-up (median follow-up ≥ 2.5yr), HIVEC shows significant efficacy in the tumor recurrence prevention (HR 0.38, 95% credible interval [CrI] 0.17–0.85).
Conclusions
HIVEC is a potential alternative to BCG especially for males and long-term efficacy, and it is expectable to be standard therapy for NMIBC patients after TURBt during the global shortage of BCG.
Keywords
bladder cancer, HIVEC, BCG
Figure 1
Figure 1 Caption
Figure 2
Figure 2 Caption
Figure 3
Figure 3 Caption
Figure 4
Figure 4 Caption
Figure 5
Figure 5 Caption
Character Count
2060
Vimeo Link
Presentation Details
Session
Free Paper Podium(03): Oncology Bladder UTUC (A)
Date
Aug. 14 (Thu.)
Time
16:36 - 16:42
Presentation Order
12