Non-Moderated Poster Abstract
Eposter Presentation
 
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
 
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
 
Submitted
Abstract
Preliminary Findings from an Ongoing Randomized Study Comparing Oral and Intravenous Paracetamol for Postoperative Pain Control Following Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
Moderated Poster Abstract
Clinical Research
Endourology: Urolithiasis
Author's Information
6
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Indonesia
Daniel Amartya danielamartya@gmail.com Universitas Indonesia Faculty of Medicine Jakarta Indonesia *
Farras Setiawan farras.cbsetiawan@gmail.com Universitas Indonesia Department of Urology Jakarta Indonesia -
Widi Atmoko dr.widiatmoko@yahoo.com Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital Department of Urology Jakarta Indonesia -
Nur Rasyid nur.rasyid@gmail.com Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital Department of Urology Jakarta Indonesia -
Ponco Birowo ponco.birowo@gmail.com Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital Department of Urology Jakarta Indonesia -
Dyandra Parikesit dyandrap@gmail.com Rumah Sakit Universitas Indonesia Department of Urology Depok Indonesia -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Abstract Content
Postoperative pain control is a key concern following percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). While intravenous (IV) paracetamol is widely used, evidence comparing its effectiveness with oral paracetamol remains limited. This study aimed to compare oral and IV paracetamol for pain control after PCNL and to explore factors associated with pain outcomes.
A total of 54 patients undergoing PCNL were randomized to receive either oral (n = 30) or IV (n = 24) paracetamol. PCNL was done under spinal anesthesia and a 26 Fr nephroscope. Pain was assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 hours postoperatively. Overall pain burden was quantified using the area under the curve (AUC) of NRS values. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were conducted to evaluate predictors of pain.
Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. The mean AUC was 50.78 ± 26.09 in the oral group and 44.92 ± 30.23 in the IV group, with no statistically significant difference (Mann-Whitney U = 407.00, p = 0.418). Pain scores at each time point were also similar between groups (p > 0.05). In bivariate analysis, postoperative fever was significantly associated with higher AUC (p = 0.036), while stone burden showed a non-significant trend (p = 0.081). Hemoglobin decline and leukocyte count were not associated with pain. However, in the multivariable regression model adjusting for paracetamol route, age, sex, stone burden, and fever, none of the variables were independently associated with overall pain. Fever was no longer significant after adjustment (p = 0.435).
Oral and IV paracetamol provided comparable analgesic effects following PCNL. Although postoperative fever appeared to influence pain in unadjusted analysis, this effect did not persist after multivariable adjustment.
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Paracetamol; Postoperative pain; Intravenous analgesia; Oral analgesia; Pain control; Randomized controlled trial; Preliminary study
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/78fc6b0c320ddda0ecb09ebdd5d4b3b2.png
Figure 1. Postoperative pain trend (Median NRS Score)
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/02bcbc9bcc31e5665708e77a284d334e.png
Figure 2. AUC Comparison: Oral vs IV Paracetamol
 
 
 
 
 
 
2807
 
Presentation Details