Home
Abstract
My Abstract(s)
Login
ePosters
Back
Final Presentation Format
Moderated Poster Abstract
Eposter Presentation
Eposter in PDF Format
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/cd545f9ec653b44d1e9a1868822153d8.pdf
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
Eposter in Image Format
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/6a9f9448cdca0dbb0c23df9674b44f61.jpg
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
Presentation Date / Time
Submission Status
Submitted
Abstract
Abstract Title
Does the Ratio of Endoscope-Sheath to Suction Sheath Diameter Affect Stone Clearance in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery? A Comparative Analysis
Presentation Type
Moderated Poster Abstract
Manuscript Type
Clinical Research
Abstract Category *
Endourology: Urolithiasis
Author's Information
Number of Authors (including submitting/presenting author) *
5
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Country
Taiwan
Co-author 1
Wei-Chun Kao wgao1994@gmail.com Chi Mei Medical Center Department of Surgery, Division of Urology Tainan Taiwan *
Co-author 2
Ting-Yi Chiang ttim.com@gmail.com Chi Mei Medical Center Department of Surgery, Division of Urology Tainan Taiwan -
Co-author 3
Kau-Han Lee kauhan@hotmail.com Chi Mei Medical Center Department of Surgery, Division of Urology Tainan Taiwan -
Co-author 4
Steven K. Huang skhsteven@yahoo.com.tw Chi Mei Medical Center Department of Surgery, Division of Urology Tainan Taiwan -
Co-author 5
Allen W. Chiu whchiu1216@gmail.com Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital Department of Urology Taipei Taiwan -
Co-author 6
Co-author 7
Co-author 8
Co-author 9
Co-author 10
Co-author 11
Co-author 12
Co-author 13
Co-author 14
Co-author 15
Co-author 16
Co-author 17
Co-author 18
Co-author 19
Co-author 20
Abstract Content
Introduction
This study aimed to assess and compare the efficacy and safety of various ratio of endoscope-sheath diameter (RESD) for the suction ureteral access sheath (S-UAS) used in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) to treat renal and ureteral stones.
Materials and Methods
We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent RIRS between March 2024 and March 2025. Participants were divided into two groups based on the RESD of the suction ureteral access sheath (S-UAS): ≤0.75 and >0.75. We recorded patient baseline characteristics, immediate and 1-month postoperative stone-free rates (SFR), operative times, complication rates, and the need for auxiliary procedures. Patients were further stratified by stone size (≤15 mm vs. >15 mm), stone location, and whether they had a single or multiple stones. Statistical analyses were conducted to compare outcomes between the two groups.
Results
A total of 50 patients were included in the study, evenly divided into two groups based on RESD values: 25 patients in the S-UAS group with RESD ≤ 0.75, and 25 patients with RESD > 0.75. The stone-free rate (SFR) postoperatively showed no significant difference between the two groups (56.0% vs. 60.0%, p = 0.774). Operative times were comparable (110.84 ± 57.5 vs. 102.96 ± 53.9 minutes, p = 0.62). Although not statistically significant, a trend toward lower postoperative serum white blood cell (WBC) counts was observed in the RESD ≤ 0.75 group (10.12 ± 3.31 vs. 12.40 ± 5.27, p = 0.073). Subgroup analysis revealed a statistically significant lower postoperative WBC count in patients with multiple stones within the RESD ≤ 0.75 group (9.99 ± 3.45 vs. 12.79 ± 3.68, p = 0.031).
Conclusions
Postoperative SFR may not significantly differ between varying RESD groups when using S-UAS in RIRS. However, the use of S-UAS with RESD ≤ 0.75 is associated with lower postoperative serum WBC levels compared to RESD > 0.75. Further studies with larger cohorts and extended follow-up periods are necessary to confirm and expand upon these findings.
Keywords
Urolithiasis, Ratio of endoscope-sheath diameter, Suction ureteral access sheath, Retrograde intrarenal surgery
Figure 1
Figure 1 Caption
Figure 2
Figure 2 Caption
Figure 3
Figure 3 Caption
Figure 4
Figure 4 Caption
Figure 5
Figure 5 Caption
Character Count
1667
Vimeo Link
Presentation Details
Session
Free Paper Moderated Poster(02): Endourology Urolithiasis
Date
Aug. 14 (Thu.)
Time
16:40 - 16:44
Presentation Order
16