Podium Abstract
Eposter Presentation
 
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
 
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
 
Submitted
Abstract
Comparing CxBladder Monitor to urine cytology as an adjunct to flexible cystoscopy for enhanced surveillance in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC)
Podium Abstract
Clinical Research
Oncology: Bladder and UTUC
Author's Information
7
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Malaysia
Reena Prhiya Ramasamy reena.ramasamy@gmail.com University Malaya Medical Centre Surgery Kuala Lumpur Malaysia *
Norshuhada Amat shuhada.amat@ummc.edu.my University Malaya Medical Centre Surgery Kuala Lumpur Malaysia -
Chung Wei Ling desmondlingchungwei@gmail.com University Malaya Medical Centre Surgery Kuala Lumpur Malaysia -
Chu Ann Chai chaichuann@yahoo.com University Malaya Medical Centre Surgery Kuala Lumpur Malaysia -
Ahmad Nazran Fadzli ahmads25@yahoo.com University Malaya Medical Centre Surgery Kuala Lumpur Malaysia -
Shanggar Kuppusamy shanggar@ummc.edu.my University Malaya Medical Centre Surgery Kuala Lumpur Malaysia -
Teng Aik Ong ongta@ummc.edu.my University Malaya Medical Centre Surgery Kuala Lumpur Malaysia -
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Abstract Content
Bladder cancer is the 10th most common cancer worldwide. They pose a high risk of recurrence and progression, hence an effective diagnostic, therapeutic and surveillance protocol is warranted. This study evaluates the diagnostic performance of the mRNA-based biomarker test, CxBladder Monitor in comparison to urine cytology in detecting recurrent bladder cancer.
A total of 100 samples were collected and analysed over a 16-month period (August 2023 – December 2024). 12 samples were excluded due to shipment issue. Results were compared to urine cytology. All patients were subjected to flexible cystoscopy as well. Data was analysed using T-test to determine statistical significance.
CxBladder demonstrated a sensitivity of 100% and an NPV of 100%, indicating its strong ability to rule out cancer recurrence. However, its specificity was 35.2%, and PPV was 14.8%, suggesting a high false-positive rate. Comparatively, urine cytology exhibited a sensitivity of 63.6%, specificity of 71.4%, PPV of 24.1%, and NPV of 93.2%. Additionally, CxBladder monitor scores below 3.5 reported an NPV of 97% and sensitivity of 93%, reinforcing its reliability in identifying low-risk patients. The study also explored the relationship between CxBladder levels and tumor histology, stage, and grade. Its use was best described amongst those with carcinoma in-situ (p = 0.007), stage Ta (p= 0.01) and of low grade (p= 0.004).
These findings suggest that while CxBladder is highly sensitive and valuable for ruling out disease recurrence, its low specificity may necessitate supplementary confirmatory tests. Incorporating CxBladder into bladder cancer surveillance could reduce unnecessary invasive procedures while maintaining diagnostic accuracy, particularly for low-risk patients. Further studies are warranted to optimize its clinical application.
CxBladder Monitor, Urine Cytology, Surveillance, Non muscle invasive bladder cancer
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1413
 
Presentation Details
Free Paper Podium(18): Oncology Bladder UTUC (D) & Functional Urology (B)
Aug. 16 (Sat.)
15:30 - 15:36
1