Home
Abstract
My Abstract(s)
Login
ePosters
Back
Final Presentation Format
Non-Moderated Poster Abstract
Eposter Presentation
Eposter in PDF Format
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
Eposter in Image Format
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
Presentation Date / Time
Submission Status
Submitted
Abstract
Abstract Title
Surgeon’s Eye Matters: Operator Experience Improves Visual Diagnosis of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma
Presentation Type
Podium Abstract
Manuscript Type
Clinical Research
Abstract Category *
Oncology: Bladder and UTUC
Author's Information
Number of Authors (including submitting/presenting author) *
10
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Country
Taiwan
Co-author 1
Yuan Ling Cheng amber115312@gmail.com Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center Division of Urology, Department of Surgery Taipei Taiwan *
Co-author 2
Yu Cing Jhuo wavinglibra@yahoo.com.tw Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center Division of Urology, Department of Surgery Taipei Taiwan -
Co-author 3
Jin Li Chen j0921713355@yahoo.com.tw Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center Division of Urology, Department of Surgery Taipei Taiwan -
Co-author 4
Ming Hsin Yang YangMing@ndmctagh.edu Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center Division of Urology, Department of Surgery Taipei Taiwan -
Co-author 5
Chien Chang Kao guman2011@gmail.com Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center Division of Urology, Department of Surgery Taipei Taiwan -
Co-author 6
Chih Wei Tsao weisurger@gmail.com Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center Division of Urology, Department of Surgery Taipei Taiwan -
Co-author 7
En Meng en.meng@gmail.com Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center Division of Urology, Department of Surgery Taipei Taiwan -
Co-author 8
Guang Huan Sun ghsun@gmail.com Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center Division of Urology, Department of Surgery Taipei Taiwan -
Co-author 9
Dah Shyong Yu yuds45@gmail.com Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center Division of Urology, Department of Surgery Taipei Taiwan -
Co-author 10
Hui Kung Ting giu0114@gmail.com Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center Division of Urology, Department of Surgery Taipei Taiwan -
Co-author 11
Co-author 12
Co-author 13
Co-author 14
Co-author 15
Co-author 16
Co-author 17
Co-author 18
Co-author 19
Co-author 20
Abstract Content
Introduction
Ureteroscopic visual impression plays a key role in diagnosing upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), but its accuracy may vary with the operator’s experience. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of visual impression and assess whether intraoperative urine cytology offers additional diagnostic value in selected clinical scenarios.
Materials and Methods
We retrospectively analyzed 81 patients who underwent diagnostic ureteroscopy with biopsy for suspected UTUC at a single tertiary center between February 2021 and December 2023. Patients without biopsy results or adequate endoscopic images were excluded. Visual impressions (“suspected UC” vs “not UC”) were recorded intraoperatively and stratified by operator experience (attending vs. senior resident). Intraoperative cytology was performed selectively at the discretion of the operating urologist. Final surgical pathology was available only for patients who subsequently underwent definitive surgery. Diagnostic performance was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, accuracy, and Fisher’s exact test.
Results
Visual impression achieved a sensitivity of 98.2%, specificity of 52.0%, positive predictive value of 82.1%, negative predictive value of 92.9%, and overall accuracy of 84.0%. Among the 20 procedures performed by the attending, visual and biopsy diagnoses were 100% concordant. In comparison, the resident group demonstrated a concordance rate of 78.7% (48/61), showing a statistically significant difference (p = 0.031). Among patients visually assessed as “not UC,” cytology was evaluated for its potential to reduce missed diagnoses. However, it failed to detect the only missed UC case in this group, and no cytology-positive results were recorded. This suggests limited diagnostic utility of cytology in low-suspicion settings (p = 1.0). Similarly, in cases visually assessed as “suspected UC,” cytology did not significantly differentiate between final UC and non-UC cases (p = 0.648), further suggesting limited utility in this context.
Conclusions
Operator experience significantly improves the diagnostic accuracy of visual impression during ureteroscopy. Intraoperative cytology appears to offer minimal additional value, particularly in cases with low clinical suspicion or when performed by experienced urologists. Emphasizing training and experience may improve diagnostic confidence and reduce the need for adjunctive testing.
Keywords
UTUC, Ureteroscopy, Ureteral neoplasms, Biopsy
Figure 1
Figure 1 Caption
Figure 2
Figure 2 Caption
Figure 3
Figure 3 Caption
Figure 4
Figure 4 Caption
Figure 5
Figure 5 Caption
Character Count
2022
Vimeo Link
Presentation Details
Session
Date
Time
Presentation Order