Home
Abstract
My Abstract(s)
Login
ePosters
Back
Final Presentation Format
Podium Abstract
Eposter Presentation
Eposter in PDF Format
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
Eposter in Image Format
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
Presentation Date / Time
Submission Status
Submitted
Abstract
Abstract Title
GLANS-MEATUS-SHAFT SCORING AS A PARAMETER IN PREDICTING THE LEVEL OF ACCEPTANCE AND QUALITY OF LIFE OF POST HYPOSPADIAS REPAIR PATIENTS: A SINGLE INSTITUTION REVIEW
Presentation Type
Podium Abstract
Manuscript Type
Clinical Research
Abstract Category *
Pediatric Urology
Author's Information
Number of Authors (including submitting/presenting author) *
7
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Country
Philippines
Co-author 1
Angeli Cabatingan angelicabatingan@gmail.com Victoriano Luna Medical Center Department of Surgery Quezon City Philippines *
Co-author 2
Fercival Sabino fercivalsabino@yahoo.com Victoriano Luna Medical Center Department of Surgery Quezon City Philippines -
Co-author 3
Jan Benedick Tagra dick.tagra@gmail.com Victoriano Luna Medical Center Department of Surgery Quezon City Philippines -
Co-author 4
Almanzhor Sendad penn.sendad@gmail.com Victoriano Luna Medical Center Department of Surgery Quezon City Philippines -
Co-author 5
Jill Christian Sasam jillchristianpaasasasam@gmail.com Victoriano Luna Medical Center Department of Surgery Quezon City Philippines -
Co-author 6
Kathleen Gonzales krgonzales79@gmail.com Victoriano Luna Medical Center Department of Surgery Quezon City Philippines -
Co-author 7
Mark Joseph Abalajon totoabalajon@gmail.com Victoriano Luna Medical Center Department of Surgery Quezon City Philippines -
Co-author 8
-
Co-author 9
-
Co-author 10
-
Co-author 11
-
Co-author 12
-
Co-author 13
-
Co-author 14
-
Co-author 15
-
Co-author 16
-
Co-author 17
-
Co-author 18
-
Co-author 19
-
Co-author 20
-
Abstract Content
Introduction
The goal of hypospadias surgery is to reconstruct a penis that is both functional and cosmetically appealing. With the advancement of hypospadias techniques, functional outcome has been less concerning, thus highlighting the patient and parent’s concerns of cosmetic outcomes. There is currently limited research for preoperative counseling of children and their parents on the quality of life, specifically the cosmetic expectations post repair of hypospadias.
Materials and Methods
A total of 23 participants who underwent hypospadias repair from January 2022 to June 2024 were scored using the GMS classification involving urethral plate quality, meatal location and degree of curvature. Postoperatively, Pediatric Penile Perception Score (PPPS) was used to assess satisfaction in surgical outcomes as determined by the patient/parents with respect to penile length, position and shape of meatus, shape of the glans, shape of penile skin and general appearance of the penis.
Results
From March 2022 - June 2024, 23 patients, of whom 19 were in prepubertal age and 4 were in pubertal ages, who underwent hypospadias repair were included in the study. Eight patients had single stage repair, while 15 boys had 2-stage repair. Urethral locations were divided into proximal (N=15), middle (N=7) and distal (N=1). GMS scores were determined by retrieving measurements taken intraoperatively. These included the urethral plate (Mean=0.45), glans size (Mean=1.73), chordee (Mean=51.74), testis (M =Right - 2.14, Left - 2.2.26) and penile length (Mean=3.35). After analysis, urethral plate (p = 0.041), chordee (p = 0.020) and GMS scoring (p = 0.040) were significant predictors of cosmetic outcomes.
Conclusions
Irrespective of age, urethral location, and the stage of repair, the GMS score is a significant predictor of favorable acceptance regarding genital appearance in patients who have undergone hypospadias repair. Predictors of optimal penile appearance included urethral plate quality and degree of chordee.
Keywords
Hypospadias, Glans-Urethral-Meatus-Shaft score, Pediatric Penile Perception Score
Figure 1
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/a994a86ae787c517540c9c00c5d4df89.png
Figure 1 Caption
Predictor values
Figure 2
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/01255fa3ff98726408904cf94c400c12.png
Figure 2 Caption
The results of multiple linear regression analysis
Figure 3
Figure 3 Caption
Figure 4
Figure 4 Caption
Figure 5
Figure 5 Caption
Character Count
2968
Vimeo Link
Presentation Details
Session
Free Paper Podium(11): Pediatric Urology
Date
Aug. 15 (Fri.)
Time
16:06 - 16:12
Presentation Order
7