Home
Abstract
My Abstract(s)
Login
ePosters
Back
Final Presentation Format
Non-Moderated Poster Abstract
Eposter Presentation
Eposter in PDF Format
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
Eposter in Image Format
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
Presentation Date / Time
Submission Status
Submitted
Abstract
Abstract Title
Attitudes in monitoring and managing patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma in Australia
Presentation Type
Moderated Poster Abstract
Manuscript Type
Clinical Research
Abstract Category *
Oncology: Bladder and UTUC
Author's Information
Number of Authors (including submitting/presenting author) *
2
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Country
Australia
Co-author 1
Kieran Sandhu kieran.sandhu2@gmail.com Royal Melbourne Hospital Urology Melbourne Australia *
Co-author 2
Briony Norris DrBrionyNorris@gmail.com Royal Melbourne Hospital Urology Melbourne Australia -
Co-author 3
-
Co-author 4
-
Co-author 5
-
Co-author 6
-
Co-author 7
-
Co-author 8
-
Co-author 9
-
Co-author 10
-
Co-author 11
-
Co-author 12
-
Co-author 13
-
Co-author 14
-
Co-author 15
-
Co-author 16
-
Co-author 17
-
Co-author 18
-
Co-author 19
-
Co-author 20
-
Abstract Content
Introduction
Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is an increasingly common cancer in Australia. There is limited information to how these patients are managed following their index procedure, and whether follow-up is completed in accordance with EAU guidelines. This survey aimed to assess attitudes amongst a small cohort of trainees regarding UTUC management.
Materials and Methods
A cross-sectional survey was distributed to current urology trainees in Victoria, Australia. It was designed to test adherence to EUA guidelines for the management of UTUC. The survey included demographics, treatment received, length of follow-up, and methods utilized to monitor for recurrence.
Results
The survey was distributed in late 2023, with a total of 10 responses, with more expected. Most respondents were senior trainees. For patients with low-grade UTUC 87.5% of respondents followed patients for 5 years. 50% of respondents performed the first urine cytology test and flexible cystoscopy within 3 months of the index procedure. For patients with high-grade UTUUC only 75% of respondents followed patients life-long. 100% of respondents performed annual urine cytology and flexible cystoscopy.
Conclusions
UTUC is increasingly common with a poor prognosis. Although limited, our data suggests that there is inconsistent adherence to the EAU guidelines in longitudinal monitoring. Further work is needed to determine whether non-compliance increases rates of delayed detection of recurrence, or whether changes in policy need to reflect differences in Australian practice.
Keywords
UTUC, Oncology
Figure 1
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/684b6025b9633c1e82fc71fe93217123.png
Figure 1 Caption
Figure 2
Figure 2 Caption
Figure 3
Figure 3 Caption
Figure 4
Figure 4 Caption
Figure 5
Figure 5 Caption
Character Count
1520
Vimeo Link
Presentation Details
Session
Date
Time
Presentation Order