Home
Abstract
My Abstract(s)
Login
ePosters
Back
Final Presentation Format
Non-Moderated Poster Abstract
Eposter Presentation
Eposter in PDF Format
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
Eposter in Image Format
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
Presentation Date / Time
Submission Status
Submitted
Abstract
Abstract Title
Multimodal Analysis Reveals Key Prognostic Determinants and Therapeutic Heterogeneity in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (MIBC)
Presentation Type
Non-Moderated Poster Abstract
Manuscript Type
Clinical Research
Abstract Category *
Oncology: Bladder and UTUC
Author's Information
Number of Authors (including submitting/presenting author) *
4
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Country
China
Co-author 1
Jiaxue Han 3583982512@qq.com China *
Co-author 2
Waichan Lok 2150918647@qq.com China -
Co-author 3
Haipeng Zhou Zhou_haipeng@outlook.com China -
Co-author 4
Ping Tan uro_tanping@163.com China -
Co-author 5
Co-author 6
Co-author 7
Co-author 8
Co-author 9
Co-author 10
Co-author 11
Co-author 12
Co-author 13
Co-author 14
Co-author 15
Co-author 16
Co-author 17
Co-author 18
Co-author 19
Co-author 20
Abstract Content
Introduction
Bladder cancer treatment optimization requires considering tumor biological heterogeneity and precise timing. Our multi - cohort study analyzed MIBC prognostic factors and treatment effect heterogeneity, aiming to provide cross - ethnic evidence - based individualized treatment.
Materials and Methods
Inclusion criteria: Histologically confirmed T2–T4 bladder cancer with surgical intervention and complete baseline data. Cohort 1 (SEER, n=14,829),Cohort 2 (West China Hospita, n=180): Prospectively collected data included surgical records, treatment regimens (e.g., immune checkpoint inhibitors), and survival outcomes. Statistical methods: Logistic regression, PSM, Cox regression, subgroup interaction analysis, and nomogram.
Results
Survival analysis demonstrated superior outcomes with chemoradiotherapy versus monotherapy (both cohorts, p<0.01), while immunotherapy showed preliminary efficacy in Cohort 2. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy (preoperative, Cohort 1) failed to improve survival post-PSM. Subgroup analysis revealed therapeutic heterogeneity: transitional cell carcinoma patients derived significant chemotherapy benefits (HR=0.46, p<0.01), whereas radiotherapy increased mortality risk in small cell carcinoma (HR=4.06, p<0.01) .
Conclusions
Therapeutic effects show significant heterogeneity. Future work should optimize individualized strategies using clinical characteristics, histological subtypes, and molecular classifications, and explore the synergistic effects of combining radiochemotherapy with targeted/immunotherapy.
Keywords
MIBC; Neoadjuvant therapy; PSM; Nomogram.
Figure 1
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/66ab4497de252a0e23183a59e7cac395.png
Figure 1 Caption
Figure 2
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/96f65244b057865f30501f7cf8b2a991.png
Figure 2 Caption
Figure 3
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/04ac10126b1efcd1ee58911a20b73a16.png
Figure 3 Caption
Figure 4
Figure 4 Caption
Figure 5
Figure 5 Caption
Character Count
1210
Vimeo Link
Presentation Details
Session
Date
Time
Presentation Order