Home
Abstract
My Abstract(s)
Login
ePosters
Back
Final Presentation Format
Podium Abstract
Eposter Presentation
Eposter in PDF Format
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
Eposter in Image Format
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
Presentation Date / Time
Submission Status
Submitted
Abstract
Abstract Title
Assessing First-Year Junior Doctors' Competence and Confidence in Urethral Catheterisation: An Australian Multicentre Cross-Sectional Study
Presentation Type
Podium Abstract
Manuscript Type
Clinical Research
Abstract Category *
Training and Education
Author's Information
Number of Authors (including submitting/presenting author) *
1
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Country
Australia
Co-author 1
Darshan Sitharthan dsitharthan@gmail.com Nepean Hospital Urology Sydney Australia * UNSW Discipline of Surgery Sydney Australia
Co-author 2
-
Co-author 3
-
Co-author 4
-
Co-author 5
-
Co-author 6
-
Co-author 7
-
Co-author 8
-
Co-author 9
-
Co-author 10
-
Co-author 11
-
Co-author 12
-
Co-author 13
-
Co-author 14
-
Co-author 15
-
Co-author 16
-
Co-author 17
-
Co-author 18
-
Co-author 19
-
Co-author 20
-
Abstract Content
Introduction
Urethral catheterisation is a fundamental skill for junior doctors, critical for patient safety and care. Despite its clinical importance, many junior doctors report insufficient training and confidence, resulting in procedural complications. This study evaluates the experience, confidence, and complication rates among first-year junior doctors across multiple Australian hospitals, highlighting areas for curricular improvement.
Materials and Methods
An electronic survey was distributed to 87 first-year junior doctors from three major Australian hospitals at the conclusion of their initial training year. Participants provided data on catheterisation frequency, self-rated confidence levels (average-difficulty, above-average difficulty, and suprapubic catheter changes), and incidence of catheter-related complications.
Results
Of the 87 invited junior doctors, 74 (85.1%) completed the survey. Competency was formally recognised in 89.2% for male catheterisation and 92.4% for female catheterisation. Despite competency sign-off, 72.9% had performed fewer than five catheterisations, 17.6% completed between 5–10 procedures, and only 9.5% performed more than 10 procedures during the year. Concerning self-confidence, just 29.7% reported being "very confident" performing average-difficulty catheterisations, while confidence sharply declined to 5.4% for above-average difficulty cases. Merely 6.8% expressed high confidence in managing suprapubic catheter changes. Alarmingly, 21.6% of respondents reported direct involvement in procedural complications, predominantly false passages and traumatic urethral injuries.
Conclusions
The results highlight a concerning discrepancy between formal competency assessments and actual procedural experience and confidence among junior doctors. High rates of catheter-related morbidity indicate an urgent need for improved training methods and greater procedural exposure in medical curricula. We strongly advocate for mandatory, simulation-based catheterisation training early in internship, alongside structured practical experience, to enhance both confidence and competence, ultimately safeguarding patient safety.
Keywords
Junior doctor education, catheter education
Figure 1
Figure 1 Caption
Figure 2
Figure 2 Caption
Figure 3
Figure 3 Caption
Figure 4
Figure 4 Caption
Figure 5
Figure 5 Caption
Character Count
2121
Vimeo Link
Presentation Details
Session
Free Paper Podium(06): Training and Education & AI in Urology
Date
Aug. 15 (Fri.)
Time
14:36 - 14:42
Presentation Order
12