Home
Abstract
My Abstract(s)
Login
ePosters
Back
Final Presentation Format
Non-Moderated Poster Abstract
Eposter Presentation
Eposter in PDF Format
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
Eposter in Image Format
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
Presentation Date / Time
Submission Status
Submitted
Abstract
Abstract Title
Fatal Rectal Perforation and Sepsis Following Traumatic Urinary Catheterisation: An Imperative for Enhanced Clinical Protocols and Education
Presentation Type
Podium Abstract
Manuscript Type
Case Study
Abstract Category *
Infectious Disease / Urologic Trauma
Author's Information
Number of Authors (including submitting/presenting author) *
1
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Country
Australia
Co-author 1
Darshan Sitharthan dsitharthan@gmail.com Nepean Hospital Urology Sydney Australia *
Co-author 2
-
Co-author 3
-
Co-author 4
-
Co-author 5
-
Co-author 6
-
Co-author 7
-
Co-author 8
-
Co-author 9
-
Co-author 10
-
Co-author 11
-
Co-author 12
-
Co-author 13
-
Co-author 14
-
Co-author 15
-
Co-author 16
-
Co-author 17
-
Co-author 18
-
Co-author 19
-
Co-author 20
-
Abstract Content
Introduction
Traumatic indwelling catheterisation (IDC), though routine, poses significant risks, especially among elderly patients with complex urological histories. This case illustrates a fatal rectal perforation and subsequent septic shock following catheterisation, highlighting critical vulnerabilities in existing clinical protocols and the urgent necessity for enhanced education, refined insertion techniques, and robust preventive measures.
Materials and Methods
We present a detailed analysis of a 96-year-old male patient with a complex history including prostatomegaly, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, previous bowel resection, and long-term IDC use. Following dislodgement at a nursing facility, multiple traumatic catheter insertion attempts led to acute presentation characterised by urethral bleeding, sepsis, and hypovolaemia. Clinical assessments encompassed CT imaging, cystoscopic evaluation, and comprehensive microbiological investigations to elucidate the cause and trajectory of his rapid clinical deterioration.
Results
CT imaging confirmed a rectal perforation and extensive surgical emphysema resulting from misdirected catheterisation attempts. Blood cultures identified Providencia rettgeri and Enterococcus faecalis bacteraemia, prompting escalation of antibiotic therapy and multidisciplinary management involving urology, surgery, infectious disease, and intensive care. Despite aggressive interventions, including IDC replacement under cystoscopic guidance and targeted antimicrobial therapy, the patient succumbed rapidly to septic shock. Root cause analysis identified critical gaps in IDC insertion technique, inadequate specialist catheter availability (coudé-tipped catheters), and insufficient catheterisation training among community care staff.
Conclusions
This case underscores the potentially fatal consequences of traumatic IDC insertion and highlights an urgent need for enhanced education, revised insertion protocols, and interdisciplinary management guidelines. Implementation of specialist IDC training programs, availability of appropriate catheter types, and mandatory early urological consultation following traumatic insertions are essential to prevent similar catastrophic outcomes. Increased vigilance and systematic improvements in catheter management practices are paramount in safeguarding patient safety.
Keywords
Catheter trauma, rectal perforation, clinical protocols, education
Figure 1
Figure 1 Caption
Figure 2
Figure 2 Caption
Figure 3
Figure 3 Caption
Figure 4
Figure 4 Caption
Figure 5
Figure 5 Caption
Character Count
2313
Vimeo Link
Presentation Details
Session
Date
Time
Presentation Order