Non-Moderated Poster Abstract
Eposter Presentation
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/e6a60444970f902900e54e81cbd24979.pdf
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/72fc5b84f7756ddf2cadeefdbf655c0c.jpg
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
 
Submitted
Abstract
Causal relations between monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA) intake and risk of prostate and bladder cancer and renal cell carcinoma: A Mendelian randomization study
Non-Moderated Poster Abstract
Clinical Research
Oncology: Prostate
Author's Information
4
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Taiwan
Zhi-Hao Chen ted0112358@gmail.com Chi Mei Medical Center Urology Tainan Taiwan *
Steven K. Huang 7224837@gmail.com Chi Mei Medical Center, Urology Tainan Taiwan -
Chien-Feng Li angelo.p@yahoo.com.tw Chi Mei Medical Center Department of Medical Research Tainan Taiwan -
Yow-Ling Shiue shirley@imst.nsysu.edu.tw National Sun Yat-Sen University Institute of Biomedical Science, College of Medicine Kaohsiung Taiwan -
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Abstract Content
Urologic cancers, prostate cancer (PCa), bladder cancer (BCa), and renal cell carcinoma (RCC), are associated with high morbidity and mortality. While monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs) have shown potential health benefits, dietary assessments are prone to confounding and measurement errors. This study used Mendelian randomization (MR) to explore the causal relations between MUFA intake and the risk of these cancers.
A two-sample MR analysis was conducted using genetic variants as proxies for MUFA intake. Outcome data were obtained from the FinnGen project (PCa: 17,258 cases, 143,624 controls; BCa: 1,701 cases, 258,704 controls; RCC: 2,223 cases, 287,137 controls). MR-PRESSO and MR-Egger tests were used to ensure the absence of pleiotropy. MR analysis was performed using the Inverse Variance Weighted (IVW) method, accompanied by sensitivity analyses to evaluate causal relations. Findings for PCa were further validated using PRACTICAL consortium data (79,148 cases, 61,106 controls).
MUFA intake was inversely associated with PCa risk (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.77–0.98, p = 0.028), and the relation persisted in validation analysis (aOR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.79–0.98, p = 0.020). No associations were identified between MUFA and RCC (aOR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.76–1.29, p = 0.924) or BCa (aOR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.69–1.28, p = 0.696).
The results showed an inverse causal relation between MUFA intake and PCa; high MUFA intake has a protective effect against PCa. No associations were found for RCC or BCa.
Monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA), Urologic cancer, prostate cancer, Two-sample Mendelian randomization, FinnGen
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/285087e47ea0d65bc7e05300a641a452.jpg
Overall workflow of Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis.
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/c516f1210ebdb2f9ab7a685c627dd224.jpg
Forest plot of IVW Mendelian randomization results of prostate cancer, renal cell carcinoma, bladder cancer, and prostate cancer validation after removing outliers.
 
 
 
 
 
 
1375
 
Presentation Details
 
 
 
0