Home
Abstract
My Abstract(s)
Login
ePosters
Back
Final Presentation Format
Podium Abstract
Eposter Presentation
Eposter in PDF Format
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
Eposter in Image Format
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
Presentation Date / Time
Submission Status
Submitted
Abstract
Abstract Title
Comparison of urinary continence rates between three different vesicourethral anastomosis procedures in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: Simple anastomosis with barbed suture, tennis-racket bladder reconstruction, and Van Velthoven anastomosis
Presentation Type
Podium Abstract
Manuscript Type
Clinical Research
Abstract Category *
Novel Advances: Robotic Surgery
Author's Information
Number of Authors (including submitting/presenting author) *
9
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Country
Taiwan
Co-author 1
Yiwei Su thelegendSEW@gmail.com Taipei City Hospital Ren Ai branch Department of Surgery, Division of Urology Taipei Taiwan *
Co-author 2
Thomas Y. Hsueh DAJ53@tpech.gov.tw Taipei City Hospital Ren Ai branch Department of Surgery, Division of Urology Taipei Taiwan - National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University School of Medicine, Department of Urology Taipei Taiwan
Co-author 3
Shu-Wen Li DAX64@tpech.gov.tw Taipei City Hospital Ren Ai branch Department of Surgery, Division of Urology Taipei Taiwan -
Co-author 4
Andy C. Huang DAM33@tpech.gov.tw Taipei City Hospital Ren Ai branch Department of Surgery, Division of Urology Taipei Taiwan - Taipei Medical University Hospital Department of Urology Taipei Taiwan
Co-author 5
Kuo-Wei Kao DBA75@tpech.gov.tw Taipei City Hospital Ren Ai branch Department of Surgery, Division of Urology Taipei Taiwan -
Co-author 6
Yu-Wei Lai DAI77@tpech.gov.tw Taipei City Hospital Ren Ai branch Department of Surgery, Division of Urology Taipei Taiwan -
Co-author 7
Yi-Jiun Hsiao DAA24@tpech.gov.tw Taipei City Hospital Ren Ai branch Department of Surgery, Division of Urology Taipei Taiwan -
Co-author 8
Shiou-Sheng Chen DAB67@tpech.gov.tw Taipei City Hospital Ren Ai branch Department of Surgery, Division of Urology Taipei Taiwan -
Co-author 9
Allen W. Chiu DAI80@tpech.gov.tw Taipei City Hospital Ren Ai branch Department of Surgery, Division of Urology Taipei Taiwan - National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University School of Medicine, Department of Urology Taipei Taiwan Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital Division of Urology, Department of Surgery Taipei Taiwan
Co-author 10
Co-author 11
Co-author 12
Co-author 13
Co-author 14
Co-author 15
Co-author 16
Co-author 17
Co-author 18
Co-author 19
Co-author 20
Abstract Content
Introduction
Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is the current gold standard treatment for early-stage prostate cancer. The most common side effect of RARP is urinary incontinence. Therefore, many different surgical techniques have been developed in recent years to improve urinary continence rates. Our study aimed to compare three different techniques of vesicourethral anastomosis in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: simple anastomosis with simple anastomosis with barbed suture, tennis-racket bladder reconstruction, and Van Velthoven anastomosis.
Materials and Methods
We recruited patients who underwent RARP for prostate cancer at our institute between January 2021 and March 2023. A total of 81 patients were included. Simple anastomosis with barbed suture was defined as using 3-4 interrupted barbed sutures to perform the anastomosis. Tennis-racket bladder reconstruction was defined as using Vicryl sutures for bladder reconstruction, combined with Van Velthoven anastomosis. Van Velthoven anastomosis was defined as using one bidirectional barbed suture for both clockwise and counterclockwise anastomosis. We compared patient characteristics, surgical techniques, and postoperative urinary continence rates between the groups. Continuous variables were assessed for normality using the Student's t-test, while categorical variables were analyzed with the chi-squared test. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS software, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant.
Results
There were no significant differences in patient characteristics between the groups. We found that both tennis-racket bladder reconstruction, and Van Velthoven anastomosis showed better urinary continence rates than simple anastomosis with barbed sutures. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups.
Conclusions
Both tennis-racket bladder reconstruction, and Van Velthoven anastomosis showed better urinary continence rates than simple anastomosis with barbed sutures, while there was no difference between the two groups. Further investigation is crucial.
Keywords
Figure 1
Figure 1 Caption
Figure 2
Figure 2 Caption
Figure 3
Figure 3 Caption
Figure 4
Figure 4 Caption
Figure 5
Figure 5 Caption
Character Count
1804
Vimeo Link
Presentation Details
Session
Free Paper Podium (27): Andrology
Date
Aug. 17 (Sun.)
Time
14:12 - 14:18
Presentation Order
8