Home
Abstract
My Abstract(s)
Login
ePosters
Back
Final Presentation Format
Non-Moderated Poster Abstract
Eposter Presentation
Eposter in PDF Format
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/8eb89d760e84c4de3b9bb5ebf0a6ce0e.pdf
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
Eposter in Image Format
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/eddf49b9d84bd2a014c06debd64c19f2.jpg
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
Presentation Date / Time
Submission Status
Submitted
Abstract
Abstract Title
Efficacy of intrarenal pressure monitoring with LithoVue Elite during flexible ureteroscopy for stone patients with positive urine cultures: a multicenter prospective observational study
Presentation Type
Moderated Poster Abstract
Manuscript Type
Clinical Research
Abstract Category *
Endourology: Urolithiasis
Author's Information
Number of Authors (including submitting/presenting author) *
6
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Country
Japan
Co-author 1
Takaaki Inoue inouetak@harahospital.jp Hara Genitourinary Hospital Urology Kobe Japan *
Co-author 2
Toshimitsu Matsuoka matu7756@gmail.com Hachinohe Heiwa Hospital Urology Hachinohe Japan -
Co-author 3
Daisuke Kudo kudod2011@gmail.com Hachinohe Heiwa Hospital Urology Hachinohe Japan -
Co-author 4
Ryoji Takazawa ryoji_takazawa@tmhp.jp Toritsu Otsuka Hospital Urology Tokyo Japan -
Co-author 5
Yuji Kato y-kato@saka-uro.or.jp Saka Urological hospital Urology Asahikawa Japan -
Co-author 6
Shuzo Hamamoto s.hamamo10@gmail.com 5. Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences Urology Nagoya Japan -
Co-author 7
Co-author 8
Co-author 9
Co-author 10
Co-author 11
Co-author 12
Co-author 13
Co-author 14
Co-author 15
Co-author 16
Co-author 17
Co-author 18
Co-author 19
Co-author 20
Abstract Content
Introduction
Postoperative febrile-urinary tract infections (f-UTI) are one of common complications following flexible ureteroscopy (f-URS). The incidence of infectious complications is higher in patients with preoperatively positive urine cultures (PUC). Excessive intrarenal pressure (IRP) during f-URS is one of risk factors related to postoperative complications due to bacteria absorption, so intraoperative control of IRP may be critical issue to prevent them. In this study, we prospectively investigate whether IRP monitoring during f-URS with LithoVue Elite (LVE) could contribute to reduce the incidence of postoperative f-UTI in patients with preoperatively PUC.
Materials and Methods
A total of 104 patients underwent f-URS in 5 hospitals for upper tract urinary calculi were enrolled in this study. The eligibility criteria were as follows; patients whose age were more than 20 years old, and who had PUC preoperatively. The exclusion criteria were as follows; patients with active febrile urinary tract infection, with a nephrostomy and women with pregnant or its possibility. The surgeons regulated less than 30mmHg IRP under real time monitering during whole process of f-URS as much as possible they can. The primary outcome was set for incidence of postoperative f-UTI until discharge.
Results
The incidence of postoperative fever was 7.7 % (n=8). In f-UTI patients, operation time was 62.1±21.0 min, mean IRP was 17.1±11.3 mmHg, and time over 30mmHg was 6.9±9.4 min. on the other hand, in non f-UTI patients, operation time was 57.3±26.1 min, mean IRP was 12.5±17.3 mmHg, and time over 30mmHg was 5.9±9.4 min. However, in terms of IRP factors, there were no significant differences between f-UTI and non f-UTI groups.
Conclusions
This was a first IRP study for clinical patients with PUC. We found that one of new thresholds might present around 17.3mmHg in fURS to prevent postoperative f-UTI. Real time monitoring of IRP may contribute to reduce the risk of postoperative fever following fURS.
Keywords
Intrarenal pressure, LithoVue Elite
Figure 1
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/ded87cd3b2ac17adc9948c253c911294.jpg
Figure 1 Caption
Outcome related IRP factors
Figure 2
Figure 2 Caption
Figure 3
Figure 3 Caption
Figure 4
Figure 4 Caption
Figure 5
Figure 5 Caption
Character Count
1691
Vimeo Link
Presentation Details
Session
Date
Time
Presentation Order