Podium Abstract
Eposter Presentation
 
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
 
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
 
Submitted
Abstract
Comparison of traditional and flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath combined with flexible ureteroscope to treat upper tract calculi
Podium Abstract
Clinical Research
Endourology: Urolithiasis
Author's Information
2
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Taiwan
Chen Chao-Hung a97026@cgmh.org.tw Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Armed Forces General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan Department of Urology Kaohsiung Taiwan * Department of Urology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Keelung, Keelung, Taiwan Department of Urology Keelung Taiwan
Lin Cheng-Chia a97026@cgmh.org.tw Department of Urology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Keelung, Keelung, Taiwan Department of Urology Keelung Taiwan -
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Abstract Content
Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is a minimally invasive procedure for the management of kidney stones. However, achieving a high stone-free rate with minimizing complications remains a challenge. The use of flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath has recently emerged as a tool to enhance endoscopic lithotripsy efficiency. This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy of using a flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath(SUAS) in combination with a traditional ureteral access sheath(TUAS) for treating renal stones.
We retrospectively collected clinical data from 238 patients who underwent retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) at Ganzhou People’s Hospital between January 2024 and October 2024. The study included 192 patients who met the inclusion criteria, with 135 in the observation group using flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath and 57 in the control group using traditional ureteral sheath. Preoperative characteristics, intraoperative parameters, and postoperative outcomes were compared. The primary endpoints were stone-free rate and the incidence of postoperative urinary tract infection (UTI) and sepsis.
The baseline characteristics, including stone size and location, were comparable between the two groups. The SUAS group demonstrated a significantly higher stone-free rate at one month (92.3% vs. 75.0%, p<0.05). Moreover, the incidence of postoperative UTI was notably lower in the SUAS group. Operative time was slightly shorter in the SUAS group, though not statistically significant. No major complications related to the use of SUAS were recorded.
The integration of suction access sheath into RIRS significantly improves stone-free rate and reduces postoperative infections. We recommend considering SUAS as a standard adjunct in RIRS for large or multiple stones, particularly in high-risk infection cases.
Renal calculi, Fexible ureteral access sheath, Flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy , Stone-free rate
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1590
 
Presentation Details
Free Paper Podium(26): Oncology Miscellaneous & Endourology (C)
Aug. 17 (Sun.)
14:30 - 14:36
11