Non-Moderated Poster Abstract
Eposter Presentation
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/518c34c19245cc7107337f712988a45c.pdf
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/bd73ca56ddeeecd912b8ffd938ba101a.jpg
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
 
Submitted
Abstract
Modification of traditional finger guided prostate biopsy aided by a proctoscope
Moderated Poster Abstract
Clinical Research
Oncology: Prostate
Author's Information
4
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
India
Abhishek Pasam pasamabhishek@gmail.com sapthagiri institute of medical sciences Urology banglore India *
Arjun N arjunn8@gmail.com sapthagiri institute of medical sciences Urology banglore India -
Abhay kumar G abhaymalur@gmail.com sapthagiri institute of medical sciences Urology banglore India -
Raaj tarun yedida raajtarun951@gmail.com university of north texas medicine dallas United States -
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Abstract Content
Prostate cancer is one of the most common cancers in men.Tissue for diagnosis and risk stratification is generally obtained by a prostate biopsy.Prostate biopsy evolved fromTrans-rectal,Trans-perineal,Systematic &Targeted approaches.There are several novel developments in the field.Robotic techniques to guide biopsy needles based on fusion images.Directly targeting lesions robotically during in-bore magnetic resonance imaging. Here we talk about modification of finger guided biopsy which is still relevant in many parts of southern Asia . Aim is to assess the efficacy and safety of modification of prostate biopsy in a tertiary health care centre. Objectives: 1. Procedure time 2. Pain score(VAS) 3. Blood loss 4. Surgeons feasibility 5. Assessment of needle stick injury 6. Post-procedural complications
Study Design:Prospective observational study with institutional ethical clearance at SIMS & RC and Clinical Trails Registry India (CTRI) Sample Size: 30 patients. Study Duration: June 2024 to August 2024 (3 months) Inclusion criteria: 1.Positive DRE examination 2.PSA > 4-10 ng/ml based on patient risk-benefit analysis. Exclusion criteria: 1.Fissure-in-ano 2.Hemorrhoids 3.Coagulation disorders 4.Perianal codylomata 5.Severe immunosuppresion 6.Acute prostatitis Patient followed-up on ;Day 1 telephonically and on Day 3 with Histopathology report. Procedure: Prostatic nodules to be visualized under vision through proctoscope under light source with a peri prostatic plexus block ; double sextant core biopsies are taken.
Average procedural time was 4 minutes;Pain score (VAS) was 3;Blood loss was minimal around 5ml;This is feasible to most of the surgeons;No needle stick injury recorded; 4 patients had hematuria post procedurally and no other complications.Out of 30 samples;23 are positive for malignancy histopathologically.
Advantages of doing this procedure are Easy Effective Quick Prevents needle stick injury to the surgeon Under vision Reproducible in tertiary as well as peripheral medical centres This is the a very important modification of a finger guided biopsy which is still relevant in many parts of India ,South Asia subcontinent as the facilities and affordability are yet to be improved in many parts of country .This definitely prevents needle stick injury to the surgeon which accidentally happens many at times during finger guided biopsy .Only disadvantage is sometimes the tissue diagnosis from apex of prostate may be missed out .This procedure can be reproduced in many centres where finger guided biopsy is still being done .This procedure is safe and may be done in other centers.
 
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/ab54ab108c5f1eca0c37775d2a2b6d7a.jpeg
Finger reaching prostate
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/f17eeb52c3ec3b55afe99cbc6b4b1461.jpeg
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1816
 
Presentation Details
 
 
 
0