Podium Abstract
Eposter Presentation
 
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
 
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
 
Submitted
Abstract
PSA Level and Metastatic Site Predict Survival Benefit from Radical Prostatectomy in Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Prostate Cancer
Podium Abstract
Clinical Research
Oncology: Prostate
Author's Information
3
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
China
Xuanji Li lxj2019doc@163.com Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan Department of Urology Chengdu China *
Yaxiong Tang tyxdoctor@163.com Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan Department of Urology Chengdu China -
Jianzhong Ai jianzhong.ai@scu.edu.cn Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan Department of Urology Chengdu China -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Abstract Content
The indications for radical prostatectomy (RP) in newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) patients require further clarification.
Newly diagnosed mPCa patients were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and divided into biopsy and RP groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline characteristics. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate cancer-specific survival (CSS). Exploratory analysis divided the patients into those with low tumor burden and those with high tumor burden and explored the benefits of RP in patients with different tumor burdens.
A total of 9,215 patients were included, with 8,844 patients undergoing biopsy alone and 371 patients undergoing RP. After PSM, 321 patients in each group were included. Compared with the biopsy group, CSS was significantly improved in the RP group (HR=0.38, 95% CI, 0.27-0.54, p<0.001). Subgroup analysis indicated that RP improved survival across all tumor burden subgroups except for M1c (HR=0.55, 95% CI, 0.21-1.46, p=0.229) and PSA ≥60 ng/ml (HR=1.19, 95% CI, 0.53-2.86, p=0.673). Exploratory analysis suggested that RP significantly improved CSS in the low tumor burden group (PSA <60 ng/ml and M1a/M1b) (HR=0.30, 95% CI, 0.20-0.46, p<0.001), but not in the high tumor burden group (PSA ≥60 ng/ml or M1c) (HR=0.98, 95% CI, 0.53-1.84, p=0.961).
In patients with newly diagnosed mPCa, the survival benefit of RP varies with tumor burden, which needs further validation.
prostate cancer, metastasis, radical prostatectomy, SEER database, cancer-specific survival
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/178275620d2404a009459a6c407823b5.jpg
Kaplan-Meier curves estimating cancer-specific survival in patients undergoing biopsy alone and radical prostatectomy before (A) and after (B) propensity score matching.
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/5fac4143c5ce65b96e811ccfc371db4c.jpg
Subgroup analysis based on tumor characteristics including TNM stage, PSA level, and ISUP grade.
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/6e2b3255d2a1f51333b40090bd849dee.jpg
Kaplan-Meier curves evaluating cancer-specific survival in patients with low and high tumor burden (A) and comparing radical prostatectomy with biopsy alone in patients with low (B) and high (C) tumor burden, respectively.
 
 
 
 
1375
 
Presentation Details